Read Part 1 HERE
https://www.topbuzz.com/@loopviral/scientists-finally-discover-ancient-blueprints-showing-how-the-pyramids-were-built-CgLALC3e8Vo
Some Historians Believe The Pyramid Required 100,000 Workers
It's impossible to agree upon an exact count of just how many people contributed to the building of the pyramids, but that doesn't mean there aren't educated hypotheses currently being postulated.
According to Greek historian Herodotus, the pyramids were built by 100,000 workers, although many of today's Egyptologists think the number is more likely between 20,000 and 30,000. Famed Egyptologist, Zahi Hawass, believes around 36,000 ancient Egyptians built the pyramids based on their size, the size of the tombs, and the cemetery
Other Historians Think Only 5,000 Workers Contributed To The Pyramid Building Process
Archeologist Mark Lehner of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago and Harvard Semitic Museum has postulated a vastly smaller number.
He noted that Herodotus wrote that 100,000 men worked in three shifts to build the structures. It's unclear whether each shift contained 100,000 men or 33,000 men worked in each of the three shifts. Lehner's team conducted an experiment and calculated how many men would be needed to deliver 340 stones each day and determined there were likely 1,200 in the quarry and 2,000 delivering the stones. Other men would also be needed to cut the stones and set them into place. He concluded the process would have required "5,000 men to actually do the building and the quarrying and the schlepping from the local quarry" to build the pyramid within a 20-40 year period.
The Alien Conspiracy
Some people believe the ancient Egyptians had some otherworld help creating the pyramids. One theory that conspiracy theorists have latched on to is that the pyramids were built by aliens. Their proof? They point out that the pyramids at Giza align with the stars in the sky that form Orion's belt. In addition, these people believe that the Giza pyramids are in extraordinary shape compared to pyramids that were constructed hundreds of years later. However, they don't take into consideration the fact that the pyramids of Giza have undergone intense preservation over the years so it makes sense that they are in better condition than those that haven't been touched.
Dutch Physicists Believed The Ancient Egyptians Used Wet Sand To Drag The Blocks Across The Desert
In 2014, researchers from the University of Amsterdam and the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter conducted an experiment. They transported heavy stone on a sledge across the sand. The proved it was significantly easier to move the sledge on damp sand versus dry sand. In fact, the action required just half the force. The reason? Wet sand sticks to itself and is more solid than dry sand. Plus, damp sand doesn't bunch up in front of a sledge while it's moving. In addition, the researchers noted that a painting from an 1800 B.C. tomb depicted a worker dumping water on the sand to help a sledge moving a heavy statue.
Another Theory: The Stones Were Turned Into 12-Sided Polygons & Rolled To The Site
Dr. Joseph West of Indiana State University developed his own theory about how the stone blocks were moved to the pyramid's construction site. In 2014, he suggested that builders might have secured wooden beams to a stone block, turning it into a dodecagon (a 12-sided object), which would have enabled workers to more easily move them, as opposed to dragging them. He wrote:
"A novel method is proposed for moving large (pyramid construction size) stone blocks. The method is inspired by a well known introductory physics homework problem, and is implemented by tying 12 identical rods of appropriately chosen radius to the faces of the block. The rods form the corners and new faces that transform the square prism into a dodecagon which can then be moved more easily by rolling than by dragging."
No One Could Find Any Copper Chisels Around The Great Pyramid Build Site
Over the years, many have wondered how so many of the blocks used in the pyramids were nearly identical in size and weight. People were also puzzled because no one has found a single copper chisel, presumably used to carve the stones, on the grounds of the Giza plateau.
In the mid-80s, Joseph Davidovits, director of the Geopolymer Institute in St. Quentin, France, theorized that the blocks used to make the pyramids were actually a composite of several materials - limestone, clay, and lime - mixed in water. He completely destabilized the idea that copper was the main component.
The Pyramid Were Actually Constructed From Concrete
French theorist Joseph Davidovits was on the right path. His ideas led to the discovery of concrete blocks that were used on top of the pyramids.
Professor Michel Barsoum from the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at Drexel University tested Davidovits's theory and determined several things. The stones both inside and outside the pyramid appeared to be "reconstituted" limestone. The stones contained a lot of water and were amorphous, which is extremely unusual for limestone. Moreover, silicon dioxide nanoscale spheres were present in one sample, indicating the blocks were not "natural" limestone.
Barsoum noted:
It's very improbable that the outer and inner casing stones that we examined were chiseled from a natural limestone block.
Perhaps The Pyramids Were Built Inside Out
When it comes to placing the large stone blocks in place on the pyramids, many believe the ancient Egyptians used large ramps. Thousands of people would have been required to set 2 million blocks to make the structures.
In 2013, engineer Peter James, whose company spent nearly two decades restoring the pyramids, disputed that claim. He called it "impossible" because the ramps would have had to be about one-quarter mile long. Otherwise they would be too steep to move the limestone and granite materials. Instead, James theorized that the workers crafted the inner core of the pyramid with smaller blocks using a series of zigzagging ramps. Then they constructed scaffolding to complete the outer core with larger blocks. James told the Daily Mail:
Looking at the pyramids from a builder’s point of view, and not an archaeologist’s, it’s clear that the current theories are nonsense. Just look at the numbers. Under the current theories, to lay 2 million blocks, the Egyptians would had to have laid a large block once every three minutes.
It would have been impossible to build the pyramids using ramps around the outside, too, because they would have ended up being larger, in some cases, than the pyramids themselves.
Plus, what happened to the ramps once the pyramids were finished? I believe the Egyptians built the pyramids like a modern-day builder builds a house.